May 2007 E-Alert
Missouri Supreme Court Overturns
Long Standing Precedent
Independence-National
Education Association, et al. v.
Independence School District:
A Fundamental Change in Missouri’s
Public Sector Labor Law
On May 29, 2007, the Missouri
Supreme Court handed down its
decision in the case of
Independence-National Education
Association, et al. v. Independence
School District. The Supreme
Court ruled that all public
employees have the right to bargain
collectively and governmental
entities may not impose new terms
and conditions of employment without
first meeting and conferring with
its employees’ collective bargaining
representative. This decision
represents a departure from over
sixty (60) years of case law.
Previously, the Missouri Supreme
Court interpreted Article I, Section
29 of Missouri’s Constitution as
allowing public bodies to disregard
agreements made with employee
associations or unions.
Additionally, the Courts previously
held that under the Missouri public
sector labor law, police, deputy
sheriffs, Missouri state highway
patrolmen, Missouri national
guardsmen, and all teachers in
Missouri’s schools, colleges and
universities did not have
collective bargaining rights. In
overturning these longstanding
principles of Missouri public sector
labor law, the Missouri Supreme
Court expressly ruled that a public
body must adhere to the terms of any
contract with a labor union or
employee association and public
bodies could not unilaterally
abandon the contractual obligations
outlined in a Memoranda of
Understanding with its employees.
As noted, the Missouri Supreme
Court’s Independence School
District decision represents a
dramatic shift in the arena of
Missouri public sector labor law.
This decision will likely encourage
union organizing among public
employees and dramatically alter
both the tenor and substance of meet
and confer discussions between
public sector labor unions and
employee associations. The Lowenbaum
Partnership encourages all public
sector employers to evaluate your
vulnerability to union organizing
and to develop a comprehensive
bargaining strategy to avoid costly,
inefficient and ineffective contract
terms which, given the Supreme
Court’s recent decision, are binding
and not subject to unilateral
amendment. The Lowenbaum
Partnership’s experienced public
sector labor lawyers stand ready to
consult with you should you require
some direction.
The decision of the Missouri Supreme
Court does not alter a private
employer's obligations under the
National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).
As you were advised in a prior
e-alert, the Employee Free Choice
Act (EFCA), if enacted, would
dramatically improve the ability of
a union to organize a private
employer and, through interest
arbitration, obtain favorable
collective bargaining agreements.
Given these state and federal
developments TLP recommends that
both public and private employers
give serious consideration to
managerial and supervisory training
on the issue of union organizing. We
would be happy to provide such
training upon request.
This E-Alert is intended as in
informal summary of certain recent
legislation, cases, rulings and
other developments. This E-Alert
does not constitute legal advice or
a legal opinion and is not an
adequate substitute for advice of
counsel. This E-Alert is not
intended to nor does it create an
attorney-client relationship. The
choice of a lawyer is an important
decision and should not be based
solely upon advertisements. If this
E-Alert is deemed to be an
advertisement please disregard this
solicitation if you have already
engaged a lawyer in connection with
the legal matter referred to in this
solicitation. You may wish to
consult your lawyer or another
lawyer instead of us. The exact
nature of your legal situation will
depend on many facts not known to us
at this time. You should understand
that the advice and information in
this solicitation is general and
that your own situation may vary.
This statement is required by rule
of the Supreme Court of Missouri.
Disclaimer
Site Map © 2012 The Lowenbaum Partnership LLC
|